Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3739 14
Original file (NR3739 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
ARTMENT OF THE NAVY
apn FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No.NR0O3739-14
15 September 2015

Fe ae
ial
———————

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10
September 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Plan Program
Manager Casualty Assistance (PERS-13) memo of 17 Jul 2014, a copy of
which was sent to you on 11 Aug 2014, and 4s being provided to you
now. You had the opportunity to respond within 30 days, but failed to
do so.

Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
Furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have

the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. in
this regard, it is also ‘important to keep in mind that a presumption
of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

 

ILL
Executive Director

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1724 14

    Original file (NR1724 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO1724-14 11 September 2014 This is in reference to your recent Application for Correction of Naval Record (DD Form Da Gy « A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8329 13

    Original file (NR8329 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased spouse's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Program Manager Casualty Assistance (PERS-13) memo of 17 Jul 2014, a copy of which was provided to ‘you en 11 Aug 2014. Conseguently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR777 14

    Original file (NR777 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3857 14

    Original file (NR3857 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Boar@ for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3828 14

    Original file (NR3828 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO3828-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4363 14

    Original file (NR4363 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a4 correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR101 14

    Original file (NR101 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5591 14

    Original file (NR5591 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3782 14

    Original file (NR3782 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support therecf and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4396 14

    Original file (NR4396 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.